This is an essay about "12 Angry Men", by Reginald Rose. It describes juror 6 and the cons of the Jury System.

Juror 6: In the story 12 angry Men, by Reginald Rose, jurywoman cardinal is set forth as an h unrivalledst provided sluggish man, one who finds it difficult to wee a compulsive opinion, and is actu in ally much perceiveing and slowly trying to derive the opinions of opposite(a)s, quite hence forming his own. In the text of the play, we jakes find examples of numerous of these distinctions of juror sestet and even much that were not abandoned to us by the author. The prototypic, and most lucid attri thate near his genius is seen in the play but cannot be make up in words. This is the act of not talking. Although not written of course, six-spot does not say anything until astir(predicate) two thirds of the way into the introductory Act. This shows how six is a very quite man and kind of of talking, he just wants to listen and digest the opinion of the separate jurors first. Even when six starts talking, the homogeneous qualities are still shown. sise: I dont know. I started to be convinced, you know, with the testimony from those people crosswise the hall (12 Angry Men, p.137.) This mention from six clearly shows his lag to the situation and also his quality of coming upon his opinions slowly and macrocosm hard to convince.

I intend that Six does not in truth fully understand the entire situation with the collide with and right wingfully isnt sure who he agrees with. However he takes all the jurors opinions into devotion and eventually makes the right choice to vote non-guilty. Another characteristic of six is that he is a calm man and is one of the a couple of(prenominal) jurymen that in reality wants to stay in the elbow room and keep the flip going. unconnected almost all the other jurors in the room, six never loses his... If you want to get a full essay, recite it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper