Review 2. 12 savage Men Play by Reginald Rose Performed at the Scott Theatre, 7th March 2004 A Masterson/ caller-out Theatre Production Directed by Guy Masterson managing director Guy Mastersons adaptation of Reginald Roses Pulitzer Prize-winning rent over, 12 uncivilised Men, is a surprisingly engaging and high-quality production considering the casts soreness; the issues it raises remain local fifty years after it was written. The play explores the enduring themes of prejudice, stereotypes, peoples convictions and preconceptions. It forces the listening to question their own views, their moral rest and how they would act in a similar situation. Set on the hottest solar twenty-four hour period of the year in New York in 1957, 12 Angry Men is an edgy drama concerning twelve jurors seeking a unanimous verdict over a 16-year-old boy on trial for murdering his father. To most it appears to be an open and shut case, compute had to think twice about it. Eleven jurors immedi ately vote to send the youth to the electric chair, insisting it is a puddle case of murder, but juror 8 (Owen ONeill) is not for trustworthy and simply wants to talk over the facts of the case and his uncertainties concerning the evidence. He questions the enemy jurors decision, arguing that a human life should be outgo some consideration; we cant decide on somebodys life in five minutes!
Discussions of the evidence reveal inconsistencies, inaccuracies and personal interpretations of the accused, the witnesses and the jurors prejudices. jurywoman 3 (Stephen Frost) has an estranged, violent relationship with his on ly son, and transposes his vicious impatie! nce to the accused youth. Juror 10 (Phil Nichol) condemns the accused because of his own paranoia; he is terrified the scum of the slums might one day present control. Each of the jurors is in turn offended or interpreted aback by the anger... If you want to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper